What is the reason for the time lag between peak of
rainfall and the peak of flow in rivers?
A: The main reason is the time needed
for the rainfall water to reach the channels either by surface runoff or by
underground flow.
In more words:
Let us consider that the
rain is falling with the same intensity throughout a particular river basin.
From all of the rain water a considerable portion of it evaporates while flowing
over land or in channels. Some of the rain falls on the trees and bush and house
roofs and evaporates, or with a time lag eventually reaches the ground. Some of
the rain is falling directly onto rivers (channels) and is therefore named
channel precipitation. Much more is overland flow, i.e. portion of the
(rainfall) water flowing from wherever the droplets fall downhill to the
channels. The time needed for a droplet to reach a channel depends from various
factors such as the channel density, length of the paths (near or far from a
channel), the slope inclination, slope ruggedness, vegetation, ground saturation
etc. So there is a lag. Moreover the lag is not the same in every part of the
river basin. Even the form of the river basin is important. If the river basin
is narrow and elongated the rainfall water from all over the basin is reaching
the main channel at roughly the same time and thus the water level will rise
quickly, but along the whole length of the channel and not dramatically - low
possibility of floods. The water level will also fall quickly after the rain
stops. On the other hand if the river basin is large (developed) in its upper
parts and is narrow in its lower parts - like having a big head on a long neck -
then all the channels will bring its waters roughly at the same time in the
central part of the "head" and there will be a dramatically water level rise in
the main channel. This water wave will then travel along the lover portion or
the "neck" of the basin with high possibility of floods.
So far we have discussed
only surface runoff (from rainfall directly included into surface flow) but
there is also subsurface runoff. Large portion of rain (not evaporated)
infiltrates into underground. This is important because for your question
because water flows very slowly under ground considerably widening the time lag.
Some of the water is flowing subsurfacely, not reaching groundwater, but
laterally down the slopes towards channels. This is called interflow which can
reach up to 85% of direct runoff. This is one of the reasons for the time lag
between the peak of rainfall and peak of flow in rivers. Some of the water
infiltrates down to the groundwater. Groundwater is usually connected with the
river beds and when the groundwater level is high (second half of rainy season
and some time afterwards) it feeds the rivers, making them permanent. This is
the answer to the question bothering Greeks in ancient times: Why do rivers flow
when there is no rain to feed them - and their springs? In those days they
thought that the Earth is a disc floating on the Ocean, and so they thought that
the springs must be connected with the Ocean beneath the Earth disc and that the
sea water rising upwards trough the disc looses its salt along the way. So, they
thought, the rivers flow back to the Ocean but do not rise its level - the
imagined circle was closed. Only later did their knowledge improve and they
realized the concept of evaporation.
And some point for the
end: We have not considered that there is precipitation other than rain,
including snow. Snow can lay long on the ground and melt only in spring time.
Also some rivers are feed by glaciers. And last but not least if there is karst
in the river basin, or even the whole basin is in karst region majority of
precipitation ends under ground, flowing trough a maize of underground channels
ending up (or not) in various parts of river bed after a time lag. This is for
instance typical for southern half of my country - Croatia.
I hope I gave You some good answers in
bad English :-),
Dr. sc. Danijel Orešić |